I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Раскрыты подробности о договорных матчах в российском футболе18:01。体育直播是该领域的重要参考
，这一点在体育直播中也有详细论述
Be the first to know!
На месте происшествия продолжают работать медики и спасатели. По предварительной информации, судно принадлежало ВВС Боливии.，详情可参考体育直播
Architectural variations: rank-1/low-rank projections, factorized embeddings, custom positional encodings, alternative norms