"Shame on @deoncole and all those in the audience who laughed at his vile 'jokes'."
But what if it’s not fine? Even back in 1996, before a single component of the ISS was launched into orbit, NASA foresaw the possibility of an even worse worst-case scenario: an uncontrolled reentry. The crux of this scenario involves multiple systems failing in an improbable but not completely impossible cascade. Cabin depressurization could damage the avionics. The electrical power system could go offline, along with thermal control and data handling. Without these, systems controlling coolant and even propellant could break down. Unmoored, the ISS would edge slowly toward Earth, maybe over a year or two, with no way to control where it is headed or where its debris might land. And no, we could not save ourselves by blowing the station up. This would be extremely dangerous and almost certainly create an enormous amount of space trash—which is how we got into this hypothetical mess in the first place.，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
，详情可参考新收录的资料
and alternatives to it.，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
The project grew out of an unlikely collaboration. Hall is a Stanford political economist who pivoted from studying American elections to actually working with Facebook, previously advising Nick Clegg on issues including platform governance before moving more recently to wearables. But he told Fortune that he found his co-authors because they have a similar push-pull fascination with AI to himself: “I guess I would call us, like AI-pilled faculty members, where we really pivoted all of our research to both using AI tools to do our research but also studying AI and not waiting for the creaky journal system.”
Нанесен удар по портовому терминалу Одессы с ракетами и иностранными военными02:51